A little more than two years ago, at my final year at college, I started to read Robert Jordan's epic "The Wheel of Time". I was so fascinated by it that I almost finished the first nine books in a few months, and started to read Terry Goodking's "The sword of Truth". Again I was so fascinated that by the end of that college year, I had finished finished the first eight books of SoT.
It's been common to compare both series and debate which is better, maybe cause of the numerous similarities between them. In both series, the hero commands powers more than anyone since thousands of years, he has to fight the dark side of the universe itself, females with supernatural powers try to control him and blend him into their schemes, although they cannot actually teach him how to use his powers, almost no one can in fact. However, after
a while a group of those females come to serve under his command. Both heroes were fathered by another one than that who they thought was there father (yuch, bas sentence). both have a lot of people fanatically following them, by magic or for the sake of prophecy, and both heroes where centric to the prophecies of their world and try to understand them, both prepare for a war far beyond reason.
I might of course have yet overlooked some similarities :) ahh, .. both heroes are of course extremely good swordsmen.
Both series are quite different in my opinion. Not because of the the small details that differentiate both worlds, like that in one there is magic while in the other it's about controlling the different powers roaming in the world (that's almost the same I guess), but because both series were written with a different aim and philosophy.
Sot is really about philosophy and ideologies, the hero is as perfect as can be, in a never ending quest for doing what is right and good, ... defeating evil is his first mission, but what really motivates him is doing what he things right, for the people, those whom he loves, and himself
The enemy is not really evil, but rather adopting different ideologies than the hero, the battle is really about beliefs, ideologies, and philosophy. And surprisingly, ... it's still very interesting!! I read the nine books almost word for word.
The only thing I don't love about SoT is that the author practically re-tales the story of the previous books each time.
WoT is completely another thing, ... WoT is a real epic, with many heroes actually, a long fight, with many inter-wined threads, some of them I don't really read and I think each one can pick his favorite threads and read them.
None of the heroes is that perfect, each has his merits and his drawbacks (my favorites are Perrin and Rand). Victory or failure is not absolute each hero battles and negotiates, and sometimes compromises.
As a novel, ... WoT is more interesting epic, but on the other hand, SoT is has more value for the mind and soul.
Thursday, November 03, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment